Important: This version of the e-Laws website will be upgraded to a new version in the coming weeks.
You can try the beta version of the new e-Laws at ontario.ca/laws-beta.
R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 935: GENERAL
under Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.23
Skip to contentDrug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act
Loi sur l’interchangeabilité des médicaments et les honoraires de préparation
R.R.O. 1990, REGULATION 935
Amended to O. Reg. 277/04
GENERAL
Historical version for the period September 3, 2004 to September 13, 2004.
This Regulation is made in English only.
1. (1) In this Regulation,
“Formulary” means the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care publication titled “Drug Benefit Formulary/Comparative Drug Index” (No. 38) dated January 30, 2003, and includes the following amendments to the publication:
1. Amendments dated April 16, 2003.
2. Amendments dated September 4, 2003.
3. Amendments dated April 6, 2004.
4. Amendments dated July 20, 2004.
5. Amendments dated August 11, 2004;
Note: On September 14, 2004, the definition of “Formulary” is amended by adding the following paragraph:
6. Amendments dated September 14, 2004;
See: O. Reg. 277/04, ss. 1, 2.
“original product” means the original source of a drug product in a particular strength and dosage form that is or was designated as a listed drug product under Ontario Regulation 201/96 or that was listed as a drug product under Regulation 868 of the Revised Regulations of Ontario, 1990 (General) or the Parcost C.D.I. prescribed under Ontario Regulation 839/84 as it read on November 30, 1986;
“production size lot” means the amount of finished product that is made from the minimum quantity of raw materials specified in a formula that can be processed using full sized production equipment into a dosage form that meets the specifications for the finished product.
R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 935, s. 1; O. Reg. 235/92, s. 1; O. Reg. 460/92, s. 1; O. Reg. 757/92, s. 1; O. Reg. 101/93, s. 1; O. Reg. 318/93, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 453/93, s. 1; O. Reg. 524/93, s. 1; O. Reg. 526/93, s. 1; O. Reg. 735/93, s. 1; O. Reg. 49/94, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 108/94, s. 1; O. Reg. 452/94, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 615/94, s. 1; O. Reg. 755/94, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 792/94, s. 1; O. Reg. 40/95, s. 1; O. Reg. 305/95, s. 1; O. Reg. 371/95, s. 1; O. Reg. 479/95, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 177/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 337/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 376/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 509/96, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 28/97 s. 1; O. Reg. 111/97, s. 1; O. Reg. 300/97, s. 1; O. Reg. 613/98, s. 1; O. Reg. 73/99, s. 1; O. Reg. 333/99, s. 1; O. Reg. 402/99, s. 1; O. Reg. 587/99, s. 1; O. Reg. 201/00, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 367/00, s. 1; O. Reg. 583/00, s. 1; O. Reg. 15/01, s. 1; O. Reg. 173/01, s. 1 (1); O. Reg. 359/01, s. 1; O. Reg. 63/02, s. 1; O. Reg. 215/02, s. 1; O. Reg. 394/02, s. 1; O. Reg. 89/03, s. 1; O. Reg. 335/03, s. 1; O. Reg. 59/04, s. 1; O. Reg. 183/04, s. 1; O. Reg. 215/04, s. 1.
(2) For the purposes of this Regulation, items 255 and 256 of Part III of the Formulary are deemed to read as follows:
255 |
5mg Tab |
4.5900 | ||
02232043 |
Aricept |
PFI |
4.5900 | |
256 |
10mg Tab |
4.5900 | ||
02232044 |
Aricept |
PFI |
4.5900 | |
Reason for Use Code |
Clinical criteria | |||
347 |
For the initial trial for patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (Mini-Mental State Exam [MMSE] 10-26), patients will be reimbursed for a period of up to three months after which continued treatment must be reassessed. | |||
348 |
For continuation of therapy, further reimbursement will be made available to those patients whose disease has not progressed or deteriorated while on this drug. Patients must continue to have a MMSE score of 10-26. |
O. Reg. 173/01, s. 1 (2).
(3) For the purposes of this Regulation, items 301 and 309 of Part III of the Formulary shall be deemed to have been revoked and item 309 shall be deemed to read as follows:
SALBUTAMOL 4.6400
309 |
100mcg/Met Dose Inh-200 dose Pk |
|||
00790419 |
Apo-Salvent (Not a Benefit) |
APX |
||
00851841 |
Salbutamol Inhaler (Not a benefit) |
KNR |
||
00874086 |
Novo-Salmol (Not a benefit) |
NOP |
||
02213478 |
Ventolin (Not a benefit) |
GLW |
||
02232570 |
Airomir HFA |
MMH |
4.6500 | |
02244914 |
Ratio-Salbutamol HFA |
RAI |
4.6400 | |
02245669 |
+Apo-Salvent CFC Free |
APX |
4.6400 |
O. Reg. 374/02, s. 1.
(4) For the purposes of this Regulation, the reference in Part III of the Formulary to 022441914 Alti-Salbutamol HFA 100mcg/MET Dose Inh-200 Dose Pk SALBUTAMOL SULFATE ALT 4.64 shall be read as if it did not exist. O. Reg. 374/02, s. 1.
2. A product is designated as interchangeable with any other products it is indicated as interchangeable with in Part III of the Formulary. O. Reg. 235/92, s. 2.
3. Revoked: O. Reg. 204/96, s. 1.
4. Revoked: O. Reg. 204/96, s. 1.
5. A person may charge more than the person’s usual and customary dispensing fee for a product that is supplied pursuant to a prescription if the person explains why a fee in excess of the usual and customary fee is being charged prior to the dispensing of the prescription and the charging of the additional fee is not an act of professional misconduct under section 1 of Ontario Regulation 681/93 made under the Pharmacy Act, 1991. R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 935, s. 5; O. Reg. 377/94, s. 1.
6. (1) It is a condition for each strength and dosage form of a drug product to be designated as interchangeable with other products that the manufacturer of the drug product submit to the Minister,
(a) evidence that Health Canada has approved the product for sale in Canada, a copy of the product’s drug notification form issued by Health Canada and, subject to subsection (2), a copy of the product monograph approved by Health Canada;
(b) a letter authorizing the Minister to gain access to all information with respect to the product in the possession of Health Canada, the government of any province or territory in Canada or the Canadian Coordinating Office of Health Technology Assessment and authorizing the Minister to disclose any information with respect to the product in the possession of the Ministry to Health Canada, the government of a province or territory in Canada or the Canadian Coordinating Office of Health Technology Assessment;
(c) documentation disclosing the product’s master formulation;
(d) the proposed drug benefit price of the product;
(d.1) Revoked: O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (4).
(e) evidence that the manufacturer is able to supply the product at the proposed drug benefit price in a quantity sufficient to meet the anticipated demand for the product;
(f) Revoked: O. Reg. 28/97, s. 2 (2).
(g) Revoked: O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (5).
(h) comparative bioavailability studies on humans, comparative clinical studies on humans, or both, or other in vivo studies that will show the interchangeability of the product with the original product; and
(i) Revoked: O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (6).
O. Reg. 18/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 204/96, s. 2; O. Reg. 28/97, s. 2 (1, 2); O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (1-6); O. Reg. 337/03, s. 1 (1).
(2) If Health Canada has not approved a product monograph for a drug product, the manufacturer of the product may, instead of submitting a copy of the product monograph as required under clause (1) (a), submit to the Minister the following information:
1. Pharmaceutical information.
2. Information with respect to the product’s clinical pharmacology.
3. Information as to the product’s indications and clinical use.
4. A list of any contra-indications, warnings or precautions in the use of the product and of possible adverse reactions to its use.
5. A list of symptoms of an overdose of the product and information as to the treatment of an overdose.
6. Information with respect to the dosage and administration of the product.
7. Information regarding the availability of dosage forms for each strength of the product marketed in Canada. O. Reg. 18/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (7).
(3) Clauses (1) (c) and (h) do not apply to the manufacturer of a drug product if the dosage form, strength, formula and manufacturing process of the product and the testing standards for both the raw materials of the product and the finished product are identical to those of the product with which it seeks to be designated as interchangeable. O. Reg. 18/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (8).
(4) A manufacturer may satisfy the condition set out in clause (1) (h) for a strength of a drug product by submitting the evidence referred to in clause (1) (h) for another strength of the same dosage form of the drug product if that information is sufficient for the purposes of evaluating the interchangeability of both the strengths of the dosage form of the product. O. Reg. 18/96, s. 1.
(5) Clause (1) (h) does not apply with respect to a drug product that is pharmaceutically equivalent to the original product, demonstrates the same physicochemical properties of the original product, is the same dosage form, packaging format and volume as the original product and is one of the following:
1. A parenteral aqueous solution, or a powder for reconstitution into an aqueous solution, that may be administered in an intravenous, intramuscular, subcutaneous or intrathecal fashion and that is in the same solvent and in the same concentration as the original product.
2. An oral solution, elixir, syrup or other similar solubilized form in the same concentration as the original product and which contains no ingredient that will affect the bioavailability of the active ingredient.
3. An ophthalmic, otic, nasal, rectal, vaginal or inhaled solution that is topical and aqueous. O. Reg. 18/96, s. 1; O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (9).
(6) Clause (1) (c) does not apply with respect to a product that has been designated as bioequivalent to the original product by Health Canada unless the product is described in subsection (5). O. Reg. 496/00, s. 1 (10).
(7) Clauses (1) (c) and (h) do not apply to a product that is a solid oral dosage form for systemic effect and that has been designated by Health Canada as equivalent to the original product or to another listed interchangeable product with which it will be designated as interchangeable. O. Reg. 337/03, s. 1 (2).
7. (1) This section sets out additional conditions to be met in order for a strength and dosage form of a product to be designated as interchangeable. O. Reg. 299/95, s. 1.
(2) A strength and dosage form of a product shall not be designated as interchangeable with other products unless it meets the following conditions:
1. If the original product is a listed product and there are no other interchangeable products already designated, the drug benefit price of the product proposed to the Minister under clause 6 (1) (d) must be less than or equal to 70 per cent of the drug benefit price, as set out in Part III of the Formulary, of the product with which it would be interchangeable.
2. If the original product is a listed product and there are other interchangeable products already designated, the drug benefit price of the product proposed to the Minister under clause 6 (1) (d) must be,
i. if the original product was listed as a listed drug product on or before March 31, 1994, less than or equal to the greater of the following amounts,
A. 63 per cent of the drug benefit price of the original product, as set out in the Formulary at the time the proposal is made to the Minister under clause 6 (1) (d), or
B. 63 per cent of the best available price of the original drug product, as set out in the Formulary on March 31, 1994, and
ii. if the original product was listed as a listed drug product after March 31, 1994, less than or equal to the greater of the following amounts:
A. 63 per cent of the best available price or drug benefit price, as the case may be, of the original product, as set out in the Formulary at the time the original product was listed, or
B. 63 per cent of the drug benefit price of the original product at the time the proposal is made to the Minister under clause 6 (1) (d),
but in no event shall the drug benefit price of the proposed product be greater than the highest drug benefit price among the drug benefit prices set out in the Formulary for the products with which the proposed product would be interchangeable.
3. If the product is an original product that was but is no longer a listed drug product under Ontario Regulation 201/96 and if there are no other interchangeable products already designated, the drug benefit price of the product proposed to the Minister under clause 6 (1) (d) must be,
i. less than or equal to 70 per cent of the drug benefit price of the original product that was set out in the Formulary immediately before its removal, or
ii. if the original product was removed from the Formulary as a listed drug product before May 27, 1996, less than or equal to 70 per cent of the best available price that was set out in the Formulary immediately before the removal of the original product.
4. If the product is an original product that was but is no longer a listed drug product under Ontario Regulation 201/96 and if there are other interchangeable products already designated, the drug benefit price of the product proposed to the Minister under clause 6 (1) (d) must be,
i. less than or equal to 63 per cent of the drug benefit price of the original product that was set out in the Formulary immediately before its removal, or
ii. if the original product was removed from the Formulary as a listed drug product before May 27, 1996, less than or equal to 63 per cent of the best available price that was set out in the Formulary immediately before the removal of the original product. O. Reg. 220/98, s. 1; O. Reg. 593/98, s. 1; O. Reg. 496/00, s. 2.
8. The following conditions must be met in order for a drug product that has been designated as interchangeable to continue to be designated as interchangeable:
1. The manufacturer of the product shall give the Minister notice of any change made to the product, including a formulation change, and of any change in the ownership of the manufacturer.
2. The product must be authorized for sale under the Food and Drugs Act (Canada).
3. The manufacturer of the product must continue to be able to supply the product at the drug benefit price in a quantity that is sufficient to meet the demand for the product. O. Reg. 28/97, s. 3.