This page was published under a previous government and is available for archival and research purposes.
Forces shaping the future of Ontario’s culture sector
Ontario’s culture sector will continue to be shaped by four major forces:
- globalization
- the economy and fiscal restraint
- the digital transformation
- changing demographics
Globalization
The world is seeing unprecedented acceleration and intensification in the flow of capital, labour, and information. Economic interconnectivity and interdependencies are rapidly increasing. Ties between people, companies, and countries are expanding, bringing increased trade, greater foreign investment, and more international movement of people.
Ontario’s culture sector generally, and the cultural industries in particular, are subject to these global influences.
For museums and other cultural institutions, globalization provides both opportunities and risks. UNESCO recognized this in one of its Draft Recommendations, adopted in May 2015: “Globalization has permitted greater mobility of collections, professionals, visitors and ideas which has impacted museums with both positive and negative effects that are reflected in increased accessibility and homogenization. Member States should promote the safeguarding of the diversity and identity that characterize museums and collections without diminishing the museums’ role in the globalized world.”
The economy and fiscal restraint
Globally, economic growth is expected to be moderate in the coming years,
In Ontario, economic growth will be weak for the foreseeable future.
In recent years, some reports, including the Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public Services, recommended that the Ontario government should restrict or redesign its direct business supports, including Ontario’s cultural media tax credits.
These provincial and national economic trends have implications for the culture sector, which traditionally depends in part on public funds. Municipalities, especially smaller, rural, and northern ones, also face fiscal challenges,
In general, wages in the culture sector are lower than the national average.
At the consumer level, precarious employment may have implications for Ontarians’ spending on cultural activities.
In this fiscal climate, public funders of the culture sector are targeting their funds strategically to achieve their goals within existing resources. The Ontario Trillium Foundation recently undertook a strategic review to align investment with improving outcomes for well-being, to ensure appropriate balance in the types of initiatives it invests in, to measure impacts of investment, and to streamline the application process to better meet the needs of applicants.
Private sector support for culture is increasingly concerned with ensuring the greatest possible impact for investment. To attract philanthropic support, the culture sector must measure and demonstrate its impact.
In Canada, philanthropic giving to the culture sector is relatively low but stable, hovering at 1% of all charitable giving in 2007 and 2010. The total was close to $108 million in charitable gifts to arts and culture in 2010.
Business for the Arts, an organization committed to enhancing private sector support for the arts and culture sector, recently commissioned a survey of small, medium and large businesses and the public in order to determine the extent to which Canadian businesses support and value the arts. The results showed that 71% of large businesses and 38% of small and medium sized businesses invest in the arts.
The digital transformation
The digital revolution has transformed the culture sector. Participation in cultural activities has increased, new networks and forms of interaction have emerged, and the production and distribution of cultural products has changed profoundly.
Lower barriers to entry are transforming our notion of cultural production. Digital technologies allow individuals to self-publish, produce, market, distribute, and sell their creations, diminishing reliance on traditional means of production, distribution, and marketing. Large numbers of professional and amateur creators are engaging with audiences directly over digital networks, and content creators can tailor their products to suit consumers across borders.
Through the Internet and social media, consumers are more engaged, participatory, and in control of their cultural experiences. The majority of Canadians accesses a social media network at least once a month, with young people more than twice as likely to be “social networkers” than people over 55.
Connectivity will continue to spread, bringing work, home, and the surrounding environment into one seamless experience as “connected living.”
With 84% of Ontarians connected, the province has one of the highest rates of Internet access in Canada.
For the majority who are connected, the digital transformation has reconfigured the ways to access, share, learn about, and participate in culture. The availability of multiple devices and platforms encourages the production of new cultural products, feeding the growing demand of Canadian consumers. Phones and wearable devices are part of an expanded computing environment, and the last five years has seen a veritable flood of connected devices into the consumer electronics marketplace. Connected televisions, automobiles, and home appliances have joined laptops, tablets, gaming consoles, e-readers, and smartphones in everyday use, shaping engagement patterns. In Canada, ownership of mobile devices is consistently higher among younger people. As these devices continue to proliferate, there will be increased emphasis on serving the needs of the mobile user in diverse contexts and environments.
These trends afford significant opportunities for culture, but also present challenges. Understanding how to harness digital technologies to offer innovative products and services, operate on new business and revenue models, and respond to new forms of engagement will require a mix of creative, technical, and business skills.
Changing demographics
Cultural diversity is a recognized, important driver of the creative economy.
Over 300,000 First Nation, Métis and Inuit people live in Ontario, more than in any other province or territory. Ontario is also home to the largest Francophone population in North America outside Quebec. The Francophone population is increasingly diverse,
Ontario’s First Nation, Métis, and Inuit populations increased by almost 58% between 2001 and 2011.
About two and a half million Ontarians are between the ages of 12 and 25. This represents about 18 per cent of the province’s overall population.
Seniors (65 years of age or older) make up the fastest-growing age group in Canada.
In 2012, 26.3% of Canadians aged 65 to 74 and 42.5% of those aged 75 and over were people with disabilities.
The cultural workforce is aging along with the general population, and succession planning will become more important to assure a smooth transition to the next generation of leaders.
Over all, Ontario’s population growth will be mostly in cities. Immigrants primarily settle in cities
Ontario’s changing demographics could translate into opportunities to create more and different cultural products and services, activities, and ways to engage and participate geared to the changing market.
Footnotes
- footnote[46] Back to paragraph Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “2014 Ontario Budget” (Ontario, 2014).
- footnote[47] Back to paragraph UNESCO, “Report of the Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts (Category II) Related to a Draft Recommendation on the Protection and Promotion of Museums, Their Diversity and their Role in Society” (Paris: UNESCO, May 2015): 5.
- footnote[48] Back to paragraph International Monetary Fund, “World Economic Outlook” (International Monetary Fund, April 2015); United Nations, “World Economic Situation and Prospects 2015” (United Nations, 2015).
- footnote[49] Back to paragraph Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Chapter 4: Long-Term Fiscal Prospects,” in “Ontario’s Long-Term Report on the Economy” (Ontario, 2014).
- footnote[50] Back to paragraph Ontario, Minister of Finance, “2014 Ontario Economic Outlook and Fiscal Review Statement” (Minister’s statement to the Legislature, November 17, 2014); Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Building Ontario Up: 2015 Budget” (Ontario, 2015).
- footnote[51] Back to paragraph Commission on the Reform of Ontario’s Public Services, “Public Services for Ontarians: A Path to Sustainability and Excellence” (Ontario, Ministry of Finance, 2012).
- footnote[52] Back to paragraph André Coté and Michael Fenn, “Approaching an Inflection Point in Ontario’s Provincial-Municipal Relations,” IMFG Perspectives 6/2014 (Toronto: Institute on Municipal Finance & Governance, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto).pdf.
- footnote[53] Back to paragraph Hill Strategies Research Inc., “A Statistical Profile of Artists and Cultural Workers in Canada” (Hill Strategies, October 2014): 5.
- footnote[54] Back to paragraph Hill Strategies Research Inc., “A Statistical Profile of Artists and Cultural Workers in Canada,” 5; Statistics Canada, “2011 National Household Survey: Data Tables”.
- footnote[55] Back to paragraph Statistics Canada, “2011 National Household Survey: Data Tables – Place of Work Status.”
- footnote[56] Back to paragraph Wayne Lewchuk et al., “The Precarity Penalty: The Impact of Employment Precarity on Individuals, Households and Communities – and What to Do About It” (Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario (PEPSO), May 2015).
- footnote[57] Back to paragraph Lewchuk et al., “The Precarity Penalty,” 25. The 44% is derived by adding 20.3% in the “Temporary and Contract” category and 23.3% in the “Other” category as shown in Figure 1 on page 25 of the report. The “Other” category refers to full-time employees who fall into one of four categories: 1) are not receiving any benefits, 2) could not confirm they would still be with their current employer in 12 months; 3) have work hours that change weekly and could fall below 30 hours per week; and 4) are self-employed.
- footnote[58] Back to paragraph Ontario Trillium Foundation, “Business Plan 2014-15.”
- footnote[59] Back to paragraph Ontario Trillium Foundation, media release (Ontario Trillium Foundation, November 4, 2014); Ontario Arts Council (OAC), “Vital Arts and Public Value: A Blueprint for 2014-2020” (Toronto: OAC, 2014).
- footnote[60] Back to paragraph Canada Council for the Arts, media release, “Canada Council for the Arts Introduces New Funding Model” (June 3, 2015).
- footnote[61] Back to paragraph Alex Parkinson, blog entry, “Creativity and Impact: Can the Arts and Corporate Philanthropy Coexist?” (Americans for the Arts, April 30, 2015); Americans for the Arts, “Corporate and Social Responsibility and the Arts: Partnering with Business to Enact Social Change.”
- footnote[62] Back to paragraph Giving USA, press release, “Americans Donated an Estimated $358.38 Billion to Charity in 2014: Highest Total in Report’s 60-year History” (June 29, 2015).
- footnote[63] Back to paragraph Martin Turcotte, “Charitable giving by Canadians,” in Statistics Canada, Catalogue no. 11-008-X, “Canadian Social Trends” (Statistics Canada, July 30, 2012): 29. The category includes organizations and activities in general and specialized fields of arts and culture, including media and communications; visual arts, architecture; ceramic art; performing arts; historical, literary and humanistic societies; museums; and zoos and aquariums.
- footnote[64] Back to paragraph The Strategic Counsel, “Building the Case for Business Support of the Arts” (Toronto: Business for the Arts, February 2015): 30.
- footnote[65] Back to paragraph The Strategic Counsel, “Building the Case for Business Support of the Arts,” 34.
- footnote[66] Back to paragraph Quorus Consulting, “Canadian Books, Films, Periodicals and Music Opinion Survey” (Ottawa: Canada, Department of Canadian Heritage, September 4, 2012).
- footnote[67] Back to paragraph Sarwant Singh, “The 10 Social and Tech Trends that Could Shape the Next Decade,” (Forbes, May 12, 2014).
- footnote[68] Back to paragraph Singh, “The 10 Social and Tech Trends that Could Shape the Next Decade.”
- footnote[69] Back to paragraph Statistics Canada, “Canadian Internet Use Survey, 2012.”
- footnote[70] Back to paragraph Statistics Canada, “Canadian Internet Use Survey, 2012.”
- footnote[71] Back to paragraph Canada, “Access to Broadband” in “Economic Action Plan 2014”; Rural Ontario Municipal Association (ROMA), “A Voice for Rural and Northern Ontario” (ROMA, October 2011).
- footnote[72] Back to paragraph Maria De Rosa and Marilyn Burgess, “Where Creativity Meets Technology in the Digital Economy: A Context Paper for Canada’s Interactive Digital Media Industry” (Cultural Human Resources Council, 2012).
- footnote[73] Back to paragraph The Conference Board of Canada, “Valuing Culture”; The Warwick Commission, “Enriching Britain - Culture, Creativity and Growth” (University of Warwick, 2015); Vivian Hunt, Dennis Layton, and Sara Prince, “Why Diversity Matters” (McKinsey & Company, January 2015), http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/organization/why_diversity_matters.
- footnote[74] Back to paragraph Bakhtiar Moazzami, “Strengthening Rural Canada: Fewer and Older – The Coming Demographic Crisis in Rural Ontario” (Ottawa: Strengthening Rural Canada Initiative, 2014).
- footnote[75] Back to paragraph Note: “Visible minority” is the term used by Statistics Canada.
- footnote[76] Back to paragraph Statistics Canada, “2011 National Household Survey,” used in Ministry of Finance, “2011 National Household Survey Highlights: Factsheet 2.” Ontario’s 301,430 people who self-identified as Indigenous are not counted as part of the visible minority population.
- footnote[77] Back to paragraph Moazzami, “Strengthening Rural Canada.”
- footnote[78] Back to paragraph Éric Caron Malenfant and Jean-Dominique Morency, “Population Projections by Aboriginal Identity in Canada, 2006 to 2031” (Statistics Canada, 2011), cited in Robyn Jeffrey and Elizabeth MacKinnon, “Ontario Arts Council 2013: Environmental Scan” (20 April, 2013): 11.
- footnote[79] Back to paragraph Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “Ontario Population Estimates” (Ontario, modified June 15, 2012).
- footnote[80] Back to paragraph Ontario Trillium Foundation, “Diversity in Ontario: A Community Profile” (Ontario Trillium Foundation, 2011).
- footnote[81] Back to paragraph Statistics Canada, “2011 National Household Survey” used in Ontario, Ministry of Finance, “ 2011 National Household Highlights: Factsheet 3.”
- footnote[82] Back to paragraph Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), “Canadians in Context - Aging Population.”
- footnote[83] Back to paragraph ESDC, “Canadians in Context - Aging Population.”
- footnote[84] Back to paragraph Samir K. Sinha, “Living Longer, Living Well: Highlights and Key Recommendations” (Ontario, Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, January 2013).
- footnote[85] Back to paragraph Employment and Social Development Canada, Canadians in Context - People with Disabilities.
- footnote[86] Back to paragraph Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), “Canadians in Context - People with Disabilities
- footnote[87] Back to paragraph Nordicity Group Ltd., “Labour Market Insights in Ontario’s Cultural Industries” (Work in Culture, April 29, 2014).
- footnote[88] Back to paragraph Moazzami, “Strengthening Rural Canada.”
- footnote[89] Back to paragraph Moazzami, “Strengthening Rural Canada.” Population projections for 2011-2025 indicate that Ontario’s rural population will continue to decline as more working-age adults leave rural areas to study and work in cities.
- footnote[90] Back to paragraph Duxbury, Campbell & Keurvorst, “Developing and Revitalizing Rural Communities through Arts and Culture: Summary Overview” (Creative City Network of Canada, 2009).
- footnote[91] Back to paragraph Jeffrey and MacKinnon, “Ontario Arts Council: 2013 Environmental Scan,” 10.