2025–2026: Building Code Commission annual report

Letter to the Minister

June 26, 2026

The Honourable Rob Flack
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing
777 Bay Street, 17th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2J3

Dear Minister Flack:

Re: Building Code Commission annual report — fiscal year 2025–2026

It is my pleasure, as Chair of the Building Code Commission, to present to you the Building Code Commission’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2026.

The enclosed Annual Report highlights the Building Code Commission’s accomplishments and challenges over the 2025–2026 fiscal year. Overall, the Building Code Commission had a productive year, having received 21 new applications and conducted 12 remote hearings.

I would like to thank my fellow Commission members whose knowledge and dedication have earned the Building Code Commission an excellent reputation as a valuable service provider in the building and construction industry. On behalf of all members of the Commission, I would also like to express our thanks to the staff of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for their exemplary expert support to the Building Code Commission. Without their excellent secretariat, administrative, technical and legal assistance, the Building Code Commission simply could not function.

Sincerely,

Stephen Wong, Chair
Building Code Commission
Encl.

Mandate

The Building Code Commission (the Commission) is an adjudicative agency whose legislative authority is set out in sections 23 and 24 of the Building Code Act, 1992 (the “Act”).

The Commission has a mandate to resolve disputes between proponents of construction projects and local enforcement officials. The Act sets out 3 types of disputes that can be heard by the Commission:

• those relating to the sufficiency of compliance with the technical requirements of the Building Code
• those related to compliance with the prescribed time frames for permit processing
• those related to compliance with the prescribed time frames for site inspections

Commitment to service and guiding principles

The inaugural meeting of the Commission was held on February 9, 1976 and was made possible by the Legislature passing the first Building Code Act, 1992 into effect in 1974. Since then, the Commission has endeavoured to provide a timely, cost effective and non-adversarial process for resolving Building Code disputes through a streamlined and accessible appeals system. In doing so, the Commission has earned a reputation within the construction industry of being an effective, useful and high-quality adjudicative body.

The Commission has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing in respect of the administration of the Commission. The Memorandum of Understanding sets out the relationship between the Chair of the Commission, the Minister and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (the “Ministry”) with respect to the Building Code Commission and the service it provides. The purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding is to establish the responsibilities of these parties and to ensure that accountability is a fundamental principle that is observed in the management, administration and operations of the Commission.

As an agency of government, the Commission conducts itself according to the management principles of the Government of Ontario. The Commission’s proceedings are governed by:

• the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, R.S.O. 1990
• the Building Code Act, 1992
• the Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability, Governance and Appointments Act, 2009, S.O. 2009
• the Building Code Commission’s Guidelines
• Policies and Procedures Handbook, Management Board of Cabinet Directives and
• the Public Service of Ontario Act, 2006, S.O. 2006

The principles and governance elements required of the Commission by these statutes and documents include ethical behaviour, accountability, excellence in management, wise use of public funds and high-quality service to the public by contributing to the health, safety, accessibility and energy efficiency of buildings in Ontario and by playing a positive role within Ontario’s building design and construction sector.

About the Building Code Commission

Building Code Commission process and procedure

The process leading to a Commission hearing begins with the receipt of an application for a hearing. Section 24 of the Act provides that the Commission may determine disputes between a chief building official, inspector or registered code agency and an applicant for a permit, a holder of a permit, or a person to whom an order is given. Parties to an application to the Commission are typically builders, developers, architects, engineers and building owners as applicants, and municipal chief building officials, plan reviewers, building inspectors and registered code agencies as respondents.

The applicant submits a completed Application for Hearing Form together with supporting documents and the application fee. At the same time, the applicant is required to also provide a copy of the completed Application for Hearing Form and the supporting documentation directly to the respondent. Once an application is received, the Commission requests confirmation of the dispute from the respondent by sending a Confirmation of Dispute Form for the respondent to complete and return. The respondent is required to provide a copy of the completed Confirmation of Dispute Form and supporting documentation directly to the applicant. The Confirmation of Dispute Form is similar to the Application for Hearing Form. The purpose is twofold:

1. To verify that there is a dispute involving the technical requirements or the prescribed time frame requirements of the Building Code.
2. To allow the respondent to explain their position on the issue.

For disputes related to sufficiency of compliance with the technical requirements of the Building Code, once confirmation of dispute is received, the Commission, under the authority in subsection 24(6) of the Act, requests a technical report from the Building and Development Branch of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. This report, known as the Technical Background Information Memo, analyzes the matters raised by the parties with regard to the provisions of the Building Code identified by the parties as being relevant to the disputed matter. The Technical Background Information memo examines the technical considerations and proposed amendments (if any) regarding the pertinent Building Code provisions.

For disputes related to the prescribed time frames, a Technical Background Information Memo is not requested, as no technical matters are involved in the dispute.

In addition to the 3 types of disputes noted above in Section A Mandate, under subsection 25(5) of the Building Code Act, 1992, a judge may refer questions respecting the interpretation of the technical requirements of the Building Code or the sufficiency of compliance with the technical requirements of the Building Code to the Building Code Commission for a hearing and report to the judge. The Commission’s procedure for hearing a court referred matter is the same as an application made under section 24 of the Act.

Hearing procedures

Once all of the required information is received and has been provided to all parties to the hearing, a hearing is scheduled.

Commission hearings, while generally informal, are conducted in accordance with procedural rules established under the Building Code Act, 1992 and the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, R.S.O. 1990.

The Commission Chair, Vice-Chair, or Chair-Designate for the day conducts the hearing. Hearings begin with introductions of the parties and preliminary matters, such as identification of exhibits. Parties can represent themselves, but applicants often choose a designated agent such as a contractor, architect, engineer, lawyer or specialized consultant.

Once a hearing has concluded, the members of the panel deliberate on the evidence and render their ruling. This decision is then communicated to the parties to the hearing and the full written decision is subsequently issued to the parties and posted online to the CanLII legal reporting website. View past Building Code Commission (BCC) decisions on CanLII.

Commission members and ministry staff

As of March 31, 2026, the Commission had 16 part-time members, which include the Chair and 1 Vice-Chair. All Commission members are appointed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council through an Order in Council. Current Management Board of Cabinet Directives permit individuals appointed to the Commission to serve a combined term of appointment of up to 10 years. The Chair, Vice-Chair, or Chair-Designate for the day presides over hearings. Commission members are on hearing panels and render decisions on disputes. Each hearing panel comprises 3 members including the chair of the hearing. The Chair and Vice-Chairs also make administrative decisions regarding operations and relations with the Ministry.

The Commission believes it is appropriate to seek staggered terms of appointment for Commission members as part of its succession planning strategy. This staggering of terms of appointment allows for newly appointed members to be mentored by experienced members and ensures that large numbers of members do not have terms that expire all at the same time.

To ensure an adequate number of members, the Commission Chair and Ministry staff work with the Public Appointments Secretariat to advertise positions for new members with relevant expertise in the construction sector.

In addition, the Commission also works at maintaining the knowledge base of its membership. It is important for the Commission to continue to solicit new members with expertise that reflects the full spectrum of relevant technical disciplines represented in the Building Code.

The following branches of the Ministry and technology cluster support the Commission in fulfilling the requirements of the Agencies and Appointments Directive:

• Housing Policy and Planning Division’s Building and Development Branch
• Business Management Division’s Corporate Services Branch and Controllership and Financial Planning Branch
• Communications Branch
• Legal Services Branch
• Community Services Information and Information Technology Cluster

The Commission receives all its staffing and financial resources from the Building and Development Branch of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

Although the Commission has no staff of its own, the Policy/Program Analyst – Building Code Commission is the Ministry staff person assigned to support the Commission. The Policy/Program Analyst – Building Code Commission is responsible for managing the overall administration of the Commission. This involves managing the appointments process, issues management, business planning, performance measurement, monitoring of expenditures, managing the application and hearing process, communicating and publishing rulings and ensuring compliance with agency sector requirements and Management Board of Cabinet directives.

2025–2026 caseload

The Commission can hold up to 3 to 4 hearings in a month; however, the number of applications received determines the number of hearings the Commission needs to schedule. For the current reporting cycle, the Commission received 21 new applications, no court referral applications and conducted 12 remote hearings.

The Commission received the following number of applications over the previous 5 years:

It should be noted that the complexity of applications continues to increase. With the increase in the complexity of the applications and the number of applications that contain multiple disputes, the Commission notes that the length of time it takes to fully hear the matter has also increased. In addition, the Commission has also seen an increase in the number of applications requiring it to examine and determine its jurisdiction and mandate, because of disputes that may extend beyond the technical requirements of the Building Code.

Analysis of Building Code Commission performance

Performance measures and targets

The Commission has long-standing established performance measures and targets that are set out in the Business Plan and are reviewed each year. These are: fairness, timeliness, quality and consistency, transparency, expertise and courtesy.

Several steps have been taken to enhance the Commission’s performance and accountability over the years, including continued monitoring of Commission-specific performance measures and continued surveying of its clients to provide feedback on the Commission’s performance. The Commission has met all of its targets for the 2024–2025 fiscal year set out in the 2024–2027 Business Plan. The results of the Commission’s performance can be found in Appendix 1.

Fairness

• The stated target of not more than 10% of hearings resulting in judicial review was again met in the 2025–2026 fiscal year with no judicial review. Survey results indicate that 100% of clients who responded to the survey agreed that they were treated fairly.

Timeliness

• The Commission has set a target for timely communication of its decisions to parties within 15 working days of the completion of the hearing for 75% of all hearings. The Commission met and exceeded its target and was able to communicate its decision to parties within 15 working days of completion of hearing for 100% of all hearings.
• The Commission has set a target to offer a hearing date within 30 working days from receipt of a complete application for 85% of all hearings where a complete application includes receipt of all required documents from both parties to a dispute. The Commission met its target and was able to offer a hearing date within 30 working days from receipt of a complete application for 90% of all hearings.
• The Commission has set a target for preparing and finalizing full written decisions within 6 months of completion of hearing for 75% of all hearings. The Commission met its target and finalized full written decisions within 6 months of completion of hearing for 90% of all hearings.

Quality and consistency

• The Commission has set a target that 85% of parties will feel that the process had a high degree of quality and consistency. Survey results indicate that 100% of clients that responded to the survey agreed that the processes and procedures had a high degree of quality and consistency.

Transparency

• The Commission has set a target that 85% of parties will feel that the process and procedures were clear and understandable. Survey results indicate that 100% of clients that responded to the survey agreed that the processes and procedures were clear and understandable.

Expertise

• The Commission has set a target that 85% of parties will be satisfied that Commission members demonstrated an appropriate level of expertise regarding the technical matters under consideration. Survey results indicate that 90% of clients that responded to the survey agreed that members demonstrated an appropriate level of expertise regarding the technical matters under consideration.

Courtesy

• The Commission has set a target that 85% of parties will feel that they are treated with courtesy throughout the application process and the hearing. Survey results indicate that 100% of clients that responded to the survey agreed that they were treated with courtesy by Ministry staff throughout the application process and 100% felt that they were treated with courtesy by Commission members.

Operational performance

The Commission believes that in order to provide quality service to the public and to the building design and construction sector, the Commission as an agency must operate as effectively and efficiently as possible. This means more than having performance measurements and strategic direction in place to strive for service excellence on a day-to-day basis. It also means pursuing excellence from an operational and administrative standpoint over the long term. To achieve this, the Commission also assesses itself on its operational performance. As with the above performance measures, operational excellence ensures accountability.

The following are some of its operational achievements in the 2025–2026 fiscal year:

• The Commission continued to accept electronic applications and held all hearings by video conference to enhance digital delivery and customer service.
• The Commission continued to maintain its compliance with the Management Board of Cabinet’s Agencies and Appointments Directive:
  • The 3-year Business Plan for 2026–2029 was prepared, finalized and submitted within the specified time frame.
  • The Annual Report for 2024–2025 was completed, approved by the Commission and submitted within the specified time frame.
  • The Commission’s Business Plan and Annual Report were publicly posted within specified timeframes.
• The Commission continued to maintain compliance with the Adjudicative Tribunals Accountability, Governance and Appointments Act, 2009.
• The Commission held 2 semi-annual meetings of the full Commission in order to complete the review and approval of its accountability requirements, assess risks and consider proposed operational improvements such as improving the timeliness for issuance of written decisions and offering timely hearing dates.
  • The Commission continues to monitor risks, including identifying and assessing the risks and proposing mitigation strategies which are reported in the Business Plan.
• The Commission continued with its practice of holding hearings by video conference and received an overall satisfaction rating of 100% from clients who responded to the survey regarding their experience.
• The Commission continues to be committed to providing services in accordance with the Accessibility Standards for Customer Service and the Integrated Accessibility Standards regulation made under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.
• The Commission Chair and Ministry staff continued to work with the Public Appointments Secretariat and the Minister’s Office to improve its membership in terms of technical expertise. The Commission has completed a competition for the vacant vice-chair position and has made recommendations that are pending consideration.
• The Commission continued its practice of surveying clients and received an overall satisfaction rating of 95% from clients that responded to the survey.

Financial report

Budget

The Commission has no financial budget of its own, separate from that of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. All the Commission’s costs, including members’ per diem remuneration, other operating costs and administrative support, are provided by the Ministry.

The chart below provides details of the costs associated with the Commission:

Note: Numbers may not add up due to rounding.

Revenues

A fee for filing an application to the Commission has been in effect since January 1, 2014. Revenues from the application fee are recorded as part of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing’s non-tax revenues. The application fee is currently $212 which has been in effect since January 1, 2023.

The chart below provides details of the revenues associated with applications to the Commission:

Remuneration of commission members

As part-time appointees, Commission members receive remuneration in the form of a per diem as established by Management Board of Cabinet’s Agencies and Appointments Directive. This per diem has ranged from $472 for members to $583 for the vice-chair and $744 for the chair. The per diem rates were updated in the Directive and are effective starting 2025–2026 as follows: $550 for members, $680 for the vice-chair and $867 for the chair. Commission members are also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses associated with attending Commission hearings and meetings, in accordance with the Management Board of Cabinet’s Travel, Meal and Hospitality Expenses Directive. The list of Commission members’ remuneration for the 2025–2026 fiscal year can be found in Appendix 2.

Costs associated with Commission activities, including member per diems and other operating costs, form part of the overall budget of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. The number of applications to the Commission or the complexity of issues raised in the applications directly impact the budget requirement in support of Commission activities.

Appendix 1 — Performance measures table

Appendix 2 — Building Code Commission appointees list

The following table shows the Commission’s Appointments from April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2026.

New appointments and re-appointments that occur after the end of the reporting period are not shown. See the Public Appointments Secretariat website for the current Appointees List.

Note: Numbers may not add up due to rounding. Remuneration represents the per diems and does not include expenses.